Yes, thirty days is standard to ask - we've pushed back and gotten anything from 45 to 90 days, depending upon the vendor, the services, and many other things. We often will do a trade, such as no late fees if we agree to a shorter payment term, or a shorter term if the vendor agrees to use our electronic invoice submissions and payment system.
For physical products or supplies, you can try making it contingent upon receipt of the goods or the invoice submission date, whichever is later. Or state that the invoice cannot be submitted until the goods/supplies/products are received.
It's a negotiation point.
Margo Lynn
------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Margo Lynn Hablutzel, JD, LLM, CISSP®
Chair Emerita, ACC Intellectual Property Network
Publications Coordinator, ITPeC
Senior Counsel - Gainwell Technologies
margolynn.hablutzel@gainwelltechnologies.comp: +1.816.514.7891 / m: +1.919.441.2945
The opinions expressed are the views of the author alone and should not be attributed to any other individual or entity and shall not constitute a legal opinion or legal advice. If you want legal advice, that is why we have outside counsel.
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 12-22-2024 13:38
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: thirty day payment terms
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Are thirty day payment terms still 'market' in supply agreements in the pharmaceutical/biotech area? As a supplier, can the supplier expect the buyer to pay 30 days of invoice? Not a 'custom' material/no IP really involved. If 30 days still market, what are some options to push back at the multinational companies who want to purchase a 'widget' and pay with 90 days payment terms?